Quote:
Originally posted by Furious_Female
Sure it's possible that if a woman and man start creating children that have longer arm bone structure and what not, but underneath the exterior, they are still a human species and will never produce anything other than human species, unless they can alter their DNA and genetic make up as well. All through history, there has NEVER been a case of this happening.
|
That's where creationism is flawed....
Who created the 'species'... we did... we said.. oh look, this one has more hair, and is from this tall to this tall and weighs this much.... cuz right now, we look at them and , well, what's similar is put in the same category... what has the same DNA markup will be in the same category...
But take that 1 million years ago...... take a family that keeps having long armed children... the children keep climbing all the time... for food, they need to get higher and higher to get the food... etc... well, after a few generations, this trait will start getting out... others that moved away will NOT have those traits as they don't need it... but they might grow different traits... for instance, they might need to run away from some predators... so they'll grow bigger legs..
Give it 100,000s of years, after 5,000 generations, then someone looking at both of these might NOT think they are the same....
DNA markup between us and fish are WAY off... but fish/human connection would be in the 100s of millions of years ago... but if you look back at the dna markup of our closest cousins you will see it matches to a great extent...
anyhow, am out for the night, no point arguing as I will not beileve that humans were created exactly as they are now... and you won't see the light ;)