4 serious questions about the Acacia letter...
1) Given that they did not send the letter via certified or registered mail, how can they prove anyone received it?
2) Given that the letter does not contain any specifics (such as URL of infringing website or period during which infringement is alleged to have occurred), is it even legitimate as a "demand letter"
3) Is anyone (who just referred traffic to sponsors) actually going to pay these fools?
4) Can anyone think of a reason why the letter should not simply be ignored?
BTW, If there is another thread with answers to these questions, sorry for taking people's time.
|