11-09-2003, 11:40 PM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: WI
Posts: 702
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Murderous
I was told by your guy there that I needed to go back over my reviews so it looks like some of us didn't do such an accurate job. I think this is caused by lack of selections in many of your categorized checklists. Alot of them are left for the reviewer to make his best decision, thus unless the "guy" was here to know what I was thinking, then he will never know why I selected what I thought was my true experienced opinion. I feel I did a good job, and it took me longer to do them than your average reviewer, because I was giving it my best, not just flying through them. I am debating on re-reviewing my 200 gallys, and taking a %50 cut in my pay for doing his job... going over my work. If you want to make this right, then pay me my 200 gallys worth, and I will be on my merry way. If not, then it will take me weeks to decide if I just want to take the loss of my time when your guy clearly knew I was in a bind.
I'm sorry, but I feel taken advantage of... not by you, but by your guy.
Again, I'm sorry for bringing this here, but I have had some troubles with ICQ.
I will also like to try your program, and give results. As I've seen the galleries first hand, and there are some good content sets, they are clean, no BS. Sounds good to me.
|
sorry to hear about your problems, but nice sig. |
|
|