View Single Post
Old 11-10-2003, 05:12 PM  
toddler
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: austin, tx
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally posted by keyDet79


I don't think so, large DBs require lots of RAM, *fast* RAM (but dual servers only accept ECC/REG memory anyway). Also, a RAID is only interesting if you need a *fast* drive (serving movies or large files for example), if you are serving html or php you probably need faster access times and less speed (ie SCSI or Serial ATA if your budget is smaller). Also keep in mind Xeon 2.0 has a much slower bus than the new generation 2.4. Always go for that one instead of 2.0. For the rest liquidmoe was right.
Yes, large DB's should have lots of RAM. However, I've personally played with multi hundred Gig databases. Trust me, you need fast disk, with good seek times. Remember, you have to get your data off the disk, down the bus, and into ram before you can use it.

RAID is NOT interesting if you need 'speed' alone. In fact in many cases RAID will slow you down, but in those cases the integrity of your data is/should be more important to you.

Should probably throw out here that I deal with a LOT of solaris and linux machines, some free/open bsd, and very little windows.
toddler is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote