Quote:
Originally posted by Krome
Please tell me where I am wrong:
1)I stated Vivid Cash wanted UK dialer traffic due to the sheer amount of consoles they use when a surfer clicks on one of the links from the UK...3 consoles is above average..60 plus consoles?
2)Leslie initially stated how she would love to see a program mailer with partners ref codes in the mail. Vivid Insider had been doing this for years and she is supposed to be knowledgable about Vivid.
3)Leslie states that Vivid are still paying on the old links, if so why was my ref code on in the email that I was sent?
4)How am I losing? I am consistent and her arguement has changed throughout this thread.
Get a life Kayla and go back to pissing in glasses at parties.
|
My dear misogynist,
Wow, you are making lots of friends today, he he he! I really don't have time for this but will indulge in 1 last post since I am so amused by some of the responses I'm seeing.
To address your issues stated above, I'm simply going to use the number they correspond to:
1) You ASSUmed that Vividcash yada yada.... If you wanted to know, you could've phrased it as a question and not the scathing, combative and full of ASSUmptions as you did.
2) You have yet to show me a program which does. As I've repeatedly posted back to you, whatever programs Vivid or anyone else USED to have are 100% irrelevant to today. I will repeat, the program you are referring to is dead.
3) As I and Carmelo previously mentioned, AS A COURTESY to webmasters who have not bothered to read the several emails we've sent out telling them the old program is dead, to please sign up for the new program
http://www.vividcash.com and update your links.
4) You are losing because you are either not reading or if you are, you are not comprehending.
Furthermore, I am nowhere near a femenist but couldn't help but notice the tone which you reply to males in the forum and the way you reply to women. You attack what you consider the weaker sex because you yourself are weak. My original evaluation of your persona stands and might've even fallen a little lower. I will not be acknowledging further posts from you as it is an unproductive waste of my time to answer to someone who clearly doesn't get it.
Kimmy, Kayla, Carmelo, Todd, and those who have chimed in, thanks for the kudos.
About Kayla, when I read her reply to you I almost, not pee'd in a cup or glass but in my pants because it was so funny.
In all my years in the industry, I seldom indulge in board bashing, it is not my style but your ASSUming initial post really got to me and I have to admit, has been quite amusing.
Thank you for the tears and laughter,
Leslie