Quote:
Originally posted by cluck
He just said there's no difference between saying that he has weapons of mass destruction and that he could possibly move to acquire materials to make them.
Basically he's always going back to "Saddam is a dangerous person and the world is better without him." Doesn't matter whether he thinks the cost or the distortions of the facts were worth it, he did good as far as he's concerned.
The guy can make some good moral points but when it comes to answering statistical questions he can't debate worth a damn.
|
How do you know when Bush is lying? HIS LIPS ARE MOVING
