12-16-2003, 10:22 PM
|
|
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Location: My network is hosted at TECHIEMEDIA.net ...Wait, you meant where am *I* located at? Oh... okay, I'm in Winnipeg, Canada. Oops. :)
Posts: 51,460
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bena1975ca
I think those voting options are a little narrow minded. I don't think he deserves to live after what he did, but I certainly don't think that he should be killed, equally, I don't think anybody should be killed.
2 wrongs don't make a right!
If the killing is to stop, someone needs to make the first move. Perhaps the Islamic people wouldn't have such a big issue with the U.S. if they showed some compassion and gave him back to their people to deal with as they will.
I certainly don't think the U.S. needs to enforce the position for which they stand any further. They could make him a martyr and stir up more bad emotion from the terrorist factions instilling further hatred for the nation and risking more terrorist attacks, or they could make a move and try to win the hearts of those groups that are still against them.
Perhaps the diplomatic move would be the best option this time. Diplomatic in the sense of giving the decision over to someone else instead of presenting them with the options that suit the U.S. best and leaning on them to make "the right decision".
|
So that's a no then?
|
|
|