Quote:
Originally posted by elric
Then 50/50 makes much more sense as long as the sponsor is not shaving the rebills.
Of course, if the sponsor is shaving all the rebills using CCBill's tools, then it would make more sense to go with a non-CCBill sponsor.
Why do you ask?
|
I think you already know why I'm asking by the way your dodging the question ;)
Okay what if it was a one month retention rate? More than likely you would go with a 75/25 payout correct? Forget ccbill, I'm talking about ALL affiliate programs. I'm going home here in a few, if I get a reply I will post why.... screw it. I don't have time for this
You wouldn't have a choice if it wasn't for this feature. I'm not trying to defend ccbill. They need to follow up with sponsors and make sure the feature is being used correctly. As well as showing the affiliates in their stats what the sponsor has choosen for those features. Not hard to do, it's in a database and only has to be shown to affiliates as well.
elric, they are reasons for why they have this and this is what I'm trying to point out. If they do not allow you to view this info as an affiliate after they have said they would, then I would become worried.
FYI, ccbill could actually be considered as a competitor for us since they have affiliate tracking built in. But what they have is something that any revshare program should have and that is flexibility for both the sponsor and the affiliate. Not for shaving. If the affiliate is being shown exactly what the options are (the way that it should be) then it cannot be a feature described as a shaving feature. This is the only fault I see, allow the affiliates to see it.