View Single Post
Old 12-22-2003, 03:30 PM  
elric
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally posted by taboo_dude


I think you already know why I'm asking by the way your dodging the question ;)

Okay what if it was a one month retention rate? More than likely you would go with a 75/25 payout correct? Forget ccbill, I'm talking about ALL affiliate programs. I'm going home here in a few, if I get a reply I will post why.... screw it. I don't have time for this

You wouldn't have a choice if it wasn't for this feature. I'm not trying to defend ccbill. They need to follow up with sponsors and make sure the feature is being used correctly. As well as showing the affiliates in their stats what the sponsor has choosen for those features. Not hard to do, it's in a database and only has to be shown to affiliates as well.

elric, they are reasons for why they have this and this is what I'm trying to point out. If they do not allow you to view this info as an affiliate after they have said they would, then I would become worried.

FYI, ccbill could actually be considered as a competitor for us since they have affiliate tracking built in. But what they have is something that any revshare program should have and that is flexibility for both the sponsor and the affiliate. Not for shaving. If the affiliate is being shown exactly what the options are (the way that it should be) then it cannot be a feature described as a shaving feature. This is the only fault I see, allow the affiliates to see it.

Dude, you are blowing smoke - I answered the question. I said 50/50, given the scenario you described.

As far as me not having choice without this feature, what are you talking about? whether the feature is there or not, I still have a choice of sponsors.

And clearly, it makes more and more sense to take a hard look at non-CCBill sponsors.
elric is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote