Just wondering where the line will be drawn when the enforcing starts?
A friend came over one night, and she brought up some religious site. Within 6 clicks of the front door, she had some of the most disgusting shit eating pix displayed on my screen that i never ever wanted to look at. They get away with posting this shit (no pun intended) cause they are spreading the word about how immoral it is.
An adult porn site and an art site can both have the same picture on a page, yet which site will be targeted? Of course the porn site which shows her taking her clothes off.
I know it is not as simple as this, but the uptight pricks who will judge us will still sit back and stroke their cocks while looking at the Bra section of the Sears Catalog cause they are too scared the wife may find their copy of Hustler.
Instead of promoting the term pornslinger, maybe we should be calling ourselves purveyors of erotic art.
Hardcore video aside, when looking at a plain picture of a naked female, I find myself wishing she were wearing sexy underwear and being a bit more of a tease.
It will definately be a bit of a witch-hunt geared toward mainstream popularity of the politician.
Question is, who will get to be a martyr for the cause, hopefully it would be people with enough money to actually fight it. Highly unlikely though, it will be lots of the little guys probably.
#################################################
My 2 cents - 1 penny and 1/3 to my US friends
|