Quote:
Originally posted by apx_bryan
I'm gonna have to disagree with you howiekins only because I can't stand her. They'll probably give her a year or two, but she's definately not going to get more than 3 at most.
|
The only reason I say 6 months is because compare what she did to what the scum at Enron did and as you know there is no comparison.
The total value of the stock was less than 300k. Her savings was about 50k or so from using the info...
So here we have a billionaire in trouble for 50k. She is guily of being stupid, dumb and greedy but it was basically just a human decision and then she lied and thats why she is in trouble. But 6 months is the most time she would deserve and probabtion or house arresst would be fine too.