|
Tim, i am truly disgusted by pictures depicting minors. Most of the population is.
Pictures of minors will be ogled by perverts, no matter how the pictures are presented - whether it be in the form of degrading filth like xboysx or a clothes catalogue - I am pointing out that both types of viewing are perfectly legal and that no regulation or legislation is going to be brought in that wont be worked around by the perverts that wish to see this.
The fact that these young boys are being presented for adult viewing is abhorrent, but legal. Methods of censorship such as draining huge amounts of bandwidth is possible, but it makes your actions no different to the self righteous moralists who wish to see all online porn vanquished.
What I wish to know is how we can say that these pictures of young boys naked are less offensive than pictures of them in swimming trunks? I would find the exact same website offensive if those boys were wearing trunks because they are being displayed for the self-gratification of a perveted minority.
So, what is the purpose of bikini pages displaying under 16 girls? What is the difference to pictures of young boys? Those pages are also used by perverts for their own pleasure.
The laws are written and we try our best to abide by them - some people push their actions to the limit of the law - like xboysx - it is wrong to persecute someone who isn't breaking the law just because you disagree with their (all be it sick) method of earning money.
There are many webbies posting here that feel they can't let their friends and family know what their chosen profession is - for fear of being branded a pervert maybe?
The general public view the internet with suspicion because of the media hype regarding online porn - moralists do not see any difference in the 'filth' we peddle and the 'filth' as we prceive it - CP.
As much as we advertise for bigger adult sites, and that it is legal to film a model of 18 years being anally violated by someones fist, and legal for us to display those images - how are we to say that the suspicious general public aren't correct in their viewpoint? The majority of the general public find that sort of viewing just as disgusting as, if not more than, pictures of naked boys.
|