Kat, one thing with this site, is that the little boys have hard-ons. I've yet to see a J.C. Penny catalog depict their little boy underwear with the little boy's little penis' fully erect.
Don't get me wrong, I've seen pictures of children in art galleries depected as art, and some of them are very beautiful pieces... But I think that whatever government controls the internet can definatley tell the difference between art and kiddie porn. If you charge $30 per month to see kids with hard-on's...it's not art.
Read
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/2256.text.html for a description of child porn.
Todd
[This message has been edited by Majik (edited 05-03-2001).]