Quote:
Originally posted by Plan9
As nice as the theories on oil sound, and as inclined as I am to actually believe them - without actual concrete eveidence, its foolish trying to argue that it was one of the motivating factors for the Iraqi invasion. Because it just can not be conclusively proved.
'Interesting Links' aren't exactly proof, eiither, and all the evidence I've seen is circumstancial at best.
|
There is plenty of concrete evidence, but you won't find it on CNN. Read this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/ - Cheney/Rumsfeld/Wolowitz's little organization. Please don't vote without having read their gameplan, it's all laid out to a fucking tee:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Re...asDefenses.pdf
Yes it's 90 pages, if you can't read that then please reconsider voting. It lays out everything from controlling the internet to securing Iraq's oil to fighting two simultaneous "theater wars" at the same to prove the US's dominance.
THIS ISN'T SOME LIBERAL DISTORTION, THIS IS THEIR OWN WORDS, AND IT'S THE PATH YOU'RE CHOOSING FOR THE WORLD IF YOU VOTE BUSH/CHENEY.
It's scary that people like Lauren walk around thinking republicans are all about cowboy hats and Alex P. Keaten. I mean she reads one obviously biased article that contradicts all facts and logical assumptions, and it makes her feel good about what she's been supporting so she eats it up.
