That is disturbing but not surprising, there's actually a case of a video distributor that went to prison because he was distributing videos of girls in leotards and dancing outfits. Fully clothed. The court said this violated the anti-child porn laws since they were made for the "titillation of the viewer" There were was no nudity, no touching of private parts, no "come hither" looks to the camera, no lollipops or teddy bears [frequent theme in "teen" galleries].
I think the name of the case was Knox.
As for hentai being covered, all the statutes I've been looking at say "actual children" which has been extended by the courts to computer enhanced adults but must still be an actual person.
Quote:
Originally posted by UnseenWorld:
If your Hentai girls look young and appear to be engaging in sexual activities, you're not exactly home free. the prosecutors have been wanting to extend their domain from depictions of actual children into more imaginary areas, such as photorealistic depictions of children made possible by advances in computer graphics.
Recently, a pedophile's parole was revoked for possession of child pornography. The CP in question was his inner thoughts as put down in his diary.
What's next, apparently, is being put in prison for our dreams.
|