View Single Post
Old 05-04-2004, 05:10 PM  
dig420
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 9,240
the only thing true about that article is that Kerry was in Nha Trang and Bush was AWOL in Alabama.

The National Review is a partisan rag only fit for rabid Bush supporters, and Byron York is a conservative hack with roughly the credibility of Ann Coulter. The Bush campaign is looking into every crevice for ANYONE to say something bad about Kerry's conduct in the war, and this is about the best they can do. Funny how all the servicemen who actually served under and with Kerry love and admire him and say it publically, while the conservative slime campaign has to go and find people who are willing to claim they remember verbatim conversations from 40 years ago concerning people whom they had no reason to believe at the time would be important later.

I wonder if he remembers the exact conversation he had with all the thousands of troops he cared for, or just John Kerry.
dig420 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote