|
CD, why don't you change your sig? How about something like: "I have trouble with the canadian justice, and as soon as I hear something that could be censorship, I shut down my brain."
"If someone's prone to committing real rape or any real crime, other studies have shown .....". That is what I want to see. Show these studies, that came to the result that sick ppl calm down looking to fake rape pix. And you posted again studies that have absolutly nothing to do with this question. It has something to do with your problems with the canadian justice, but that's all. Non of your studies has anything to do with ppl with schizophrenia or psychosis or any other brain damage.
And that's why I call you low, CD. In the whole thread I can't find any post, that stated that violence or sex or both has negative impacts to mental sane ppl. But the whole time you are acting as if I would do so, and this with the additude of the last defender of the freedom. Low, CD, no arguments, only low style.
(When I have nothing better to do, I will post tomorrow why Donnersteins studies are bullshit)
AMP: You are a little bit confusing the last two days. After my posts about ppl with schizophrenia or another psychosis, you post about your own experiences. Do you feel concerned if I'm writing about sickos?
And at last a hint to ppl with problems to read a post: here is only one person talking about censorship for fantasys in our heads. The rest of the thread is about pictures or movies with simulated rape. And in on of my posts I wrote about drawings of kiddyporn, and in the next message I used the term "fake kiddyporn" for this. Do you think it should be allowed? In the USA it's allowed, in some other countries not. And you can go one step further: if you know how to handle photoshop or something similar, you can create pictures that have nothing to do with a real person, but that show kiddyporn.So you can have kiddyporn without a victim - should this be allowed?
|