Quote:
Originally posted by latinasojourn
sometimes i don't know why i bother trying to educate a few young people on the dangers of toying with the US DOJ.
and since it's late, and i'm about to go offline, i will make a final attempt to give the REASON why playing around with images of minors is a VERY RISKY PASTIME for US citizens.
i am not talking about merely posting a news image---i am refering to something that certain people in this thread are "begging for", namely to photoshop this image of a 17 year old in a sexually provocative way...
don't even think about it if you are in the USA.
emphasis mine:
''child pornography'' means any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where -
---------------------------------
(B)
such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C)
such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(D)
such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
(9)
''identifiable minor'' -
-----------------------------------
if you guys claim to be in the adult business you best get conversant with applicable law if you do business in USA.
|
My friend, please spare me the condescending "young people" crap, k?
I've been at this game a while, I'm older than most here.
... and you really need to just lighten up a bit with the legal shmegal advice shit sometimes. It's great on some threads and much appreciated, but there are these other times when.... well..... it's just downright annoying as shit.
Her pic is on thousands of other sites, news, media, private, public, ETC ETC ET-fucking-CETERA.
Just relax.