08-01-2004, 06:23 PM
|
|
|
Tube groupie.
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: LoScandalous, CA
Posts: 13,482
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Greg B
I doubt that with the highest 'D'. Even the Supereme Court wouldn't tackle with us artists. It would be the most foolhardy of attempts.
You have to understand, cartoonists, political cartoonists have been our most effective weapon against tyranny. We took down King George, Boss Tweed, Hitler, Nixon and we keep on rolling and with the net we're more powerful.
People don't always read, but they sure as hell understand a cartoon.
As this law is laid out, it would be stupid to attacfk a guy for a bannder ad.
As for the 'We must protect the women from the evil rapist content producer' that's bullshit.
What we need to do is protect each model from themselves and their stupid assed choices of friends and associates..
I helped change laws across the country regarding battered women and as I type am handling a murder case of a friend who may have been another victim of long term abuse.
The one thing that has never failed to amaze me is how women, in the U.S. granted the right to choose their friends and associates, so that they 'wouldn't' end up beaten, raped and taken advantage of, make bee lines to the same savage asswipes the laws were laid out to protect them from. Given half the chance women will still actively pursue a man without checking his background, without considering his character and associates and base their choices on his 'looks' and ' gee won't my friends think he's cool '.
This new law is cool that the government is showing it cares but it's only a band aid on a gaping wound: Hole In The Fucking Head.
|
LOL - I was just making a joke. |
|
|