Quote:
Originally posted by phogirl69
I was debating with my friend and she said she is going to vote Bush and not Kerry because Bush according to her is for "security" while Kerry is not, and because Bush is more experienced. She thinks that everyone wants to bomb the US and she's more in favor of security I guess.. She would rather be more secure but lose personal liberties.
Someone counter argue this so I can use your arguments against my friend and win next time we argue, I'm not too much into politics so couldn't think of a good rebuttal.
|
Bush says he's for secrity, but he's lying. When he's cutting funding to first responders, police, firemen, etc, how can he says he cares about the safety of the US people? He's spending 400 billion on an illegal war that's breeding terrorists who want to kill us, instead of spending the money at home on things like port security. Kerry will do a way better job making the US safer.