Quote:
Originally posted by uno
Being on the same boat and being on the same river would provide different perspectives I'd imagine. Kerry's vote still makes sense if that was verbatim or not I don't know. Anyone with nuclear weapons is a threat.
He did explain what he did in Paris. It was part of his testimony to congress.
|
These men also lived with Kerry in veitnam, it's not just about the river. But again, I wasn't there so I won't judge... But, I think the Swift Boat people have earned a right to speak. And Kerry again doesnt deny their claims...
And it was verbatim I believe their are a host of others... I'm sure google would provide them if asked... The point is Kerry lied too with your argument that the president lied... It was faulty intelligence... but even if Saddam had no WMD's he still could make a lot within short notice and possibly supply them to his terroist connections... His ability to produce them was confirmed with a NY Times interview of the former WMD program leader for Iraq. The bigger point is that before the Clinton people got involved Kerry though Iraq was better after Saddam. (I think who can really tell)
Hrm, enlighten me then, why did he goto paris?