View Single Post
Old 09-28-2004, 03:51 PM  
AdPatron
No commissions, no fees.
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 17,706
Who thinks Saddam was better at running Iraq?

When Saddam was in power, there weren't any insurgents. No bombings, kidnappings, most people didn't have any guns. The money used for the war could have been used just to keep an eye on him and we wouldn't have those 1000+ dead soldiers.

So, who thinks Saddam was better?
AdPatron is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote