|
I forget the site, but there was one sponsor selling truly underage girls - non-nude, but almost nude, and looking seductive. I think this is getting common, but this site in particular, I know for a fact, is making a lot of money. I don't care if they're nude or not... they're still little girls, and old pervs are whacking off while looking at them.
It may be a good way to make a profit, but I think it's wrong and refuse to do it. There have been so many discussions about the American Porn documentary, and porn prosecutions, and public perception of our industry. Don't you think this underage non-nude girl trend will hurt our profits in the long run more than help us in the short term? It definitely doesn't help our cause... it doesn't help society accept our industry, and it sure as hell isn't curbing our government's urge to put pornographers behind bars.
|