View Single Post
Old 11-05-2004, 05:47 AM  
CET
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,754
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe Citizen
No, it's 'scientific' creationism, not 'scientific creationism'.

http://www.scientificcreationism.org/
This is not directed at you personally.

Creationism, not "scientific" creationism. This is a misnomer, beacuse there is NOTHING scientific about creationism and I detest the usage of that word in that phrase. It's an insult to science as we know it.
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!

Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training

"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."
CET is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote