View Single Post
Old 12-11-2004, 04:25 PM  
- Jesus Christ -
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ::::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::||||||||||||:::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: :::::::::::||::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::
Posts: 7,197
Quote:
Originally posted by The_Oracle_Porn
dual channel > extra cache
no... just no.

Only thing dual cahnnel will "Speed Up" is synthetic benchmarks and if your manipulating large databases.


an extra 512K is about equivalent to an extra 200MHz clock speed.
__________________

Amen

Last edited by - Jesus Christ -; 12-11-2004 at 04:26 PM..
- Jesus Christ - is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote