Quote:
Originally posted by Screaming
i would think one that they are dangerous for the body, two they offer and advantage to the taker what ever that may be and i beleive that all performers should be equal
|
One, they are only dangerous to people who have no clue what they're doing. Most professional athletes are surrounded by enough knowledgable individuals to not be in this category. Even so, it's their body. Why can't they do whatever they want to with their body?
Two, not everyone is on equal footing. Genetics plays a FAR greater role in advantages/disadvantages then steroids can. Besides, what's the difference between using a steroid to increase performance and using the newest and greatest shoe, swim suit, etc.?
__________________
Alt Journals, Blogs for Perverts!
Fitness and nutrition writer, and UNIX/Linux Sys Ad in training
"Just as a man who has fallen into a heap of filth ought to seek the great pond of water covered with lotuses, which is near by: even so seek thou for the great deathless lake of Nirvana to wash off the defilement of wrong. If the lake is not sought, it is not the fault of the lake."