Quote:
Originally posted by CET
No, you made the assertion, so you prove it. I'm not going to prove your arugment for you.
|
And I'm not gonna spend a lot of time on this looking up all the numbers again, because this is just a discussion on a message board. I've seen the numbers in the past though, showing how each time red bull got approved somewhere and was introduced into a market, it immediately sold loads and loads - for a large part because the earlier "not being legal" created a buzz.
Believe me or not, I advise you to check it out yourself, but I can't force you to accept reality.
Meanwhile, ask yourself if Red Bull would be able to have a $4BN yearly sales volume if it wasn't being sold in supermarkets, bars, etc.
Oh, and it might also be a good idea to think about drug sales on specific drugs after they get approved by the FDA
Quote:
Originally posted by CET
The second does not necessarily follow, because every prohibition in history was not followed by increased usage upon legalization.
|
So you do not think better distribution and better availability help increase sales? How about lower prices then?
I know that if I'm not able to get something or if I'm not able to afford it, I'm not likely to buy it... but maybe that's just me.