Quote:
Originally posted by UnseenWorld
That's why you have them sign a release! The release says they don't mind where the photo or used or how. It holds you harmless for anything undesirable that happens as a consequence, etc. It usually also says that they've read the release through and are signing it after giving it due thought, that they weren't under duress, and so on. Releases can be set aside, but they require a better reason than that it hurt their reputation.
Why not offer to let the girl buy herself out. Estimate how much the pics would probably make you in the next five years and then set up a payment plan. Take them off the market immediately, but tell her they'll be back on the market if she misses a payment.
|
Ok Unseen, but what about the webmasters that have already bought a licensce to use the images? What sort of stipulation in this deal is there for them?
You guys deal a lot in repeat business, and if I buy a set today, and then I am told months from now that I have to remove the pictures or be subject to litigation by the model who bought her pics back, that's one provider I'll never do business with again. (and imagine the nightmare involved for webmasters who used the images for banner and tour designs)
And still no one has answered the most important question of this thread. Are her tits real? LOL