Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Webby
One my  worth - unless some serious proposals for settlement arise *very* shortly, - I'm interested in iBill being terminated by others and passed to genuinely independent recievers appointed by a court and without any further appointments by iBill of contaminated "third party escrow agents" or "updates" and an inquiry into iBill from prior to the day Intecerpt became involved. |
What court? What "rights" do you think you have to make any demands as to who the escrow agent is? You truly are in a powerless position right now, and one that I don't envy and i understand the frustration.
The point is that the EU bank that handled the CC transactions for EU iBilll STOPPED sending payments to iBILL because they saw that EU webmasters weren't getting paid. In order for EU webmasters to get paid, SOME solution was needed. Inteca stepped in as being the third party, and for whatever credintials, etc, the EU Bank agreed to the deal.
It doesn't matter whether you trust Inteca or not. It doesn't even matter if you find Chris Williams to have any integrity at all. What matters is that the EU bank will be releasing the funds to Inteca for disbursements to be made.
If Inteca doesn't do what they are supposed to do, don't you think that the EU bank will know how to track Inteca down? Don't you think that the bank will have some kind of assurances in place that Inteca isn't a scam?
I realize that lack of info and some creative detective work have added alot of fuel to this blazing fire... wild speculations and lack of facts to a disservice to everyone. I hope that by me cutting right to the points, that those that are uncertain about what is going on can focus on the facts, rather than the speculations.
Fight the Patience comes to those that wait!