Quote:
Originally posted by mike503
do they have proof of age for any of these chicks? i would think that that would be as important if not a bigger issue than the fact that their tits are being wanked to by thousands of anonymous porno'ers.
|
2257 only applies to certain types of activity, though, right? From what I have read, it doesn't necessarily apply to simple nudity.
They aren't having sex, they're flashing tits, I don't think 2257 applies.
However, if they start grabbing each other, which they probably do on the video, then it might apply.
I might be wrong about that.
I think the Fly has a good point. They have no right to expect privacy, but can't they expect to get paid for use of their likeness? It's an interesting question.
I think the judge made the right decision. However, if some guy took a picture of me walking down the road, and sold that picture for millions of dollars, you can bet I would probably come looking for a piece.