Originally Posted by rankscom

Is it true that ASACP benefits with funding (percent or per domain) in direct proportion to the number of .xxx domains that will be sold?

If ASACP is benefitting from .xxx directly or indirectly, is the funding used for any other purpose other than to fight child porn? (misc business expenses, salaries, etc)

Although I highly respect Connor, I'm looking at Joan's statement and don't see it as an endorsement for .xxx:

"I applaud IFFOR and ICM Registry's initiative to integrate tools and
technology of finding and reporting child pornography"...

It's almost like Joan is looking to exploit any opportunity to fight child pornography, which isn't necessarily a bad thing. She doesn't seem to be looking to take a bias either way, she's just saying hey thanks for considering ASACP. That's how I read it at least. My honest take so far, but I reserve my final judgement until more questions are answered.

It's hard to go against ASACP since they've done a lot of good for this industry. If any type of organization should be given the benefit of the doubt, it seems this would be one.

p.s. I'm strongly against the .xxx domain extension.