Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Connor
Do you REALLY think that's how ICANN would view it? As a generic, general, neutral message that is neither for nor against dot xxx? Or do you think they'd check that one off as support? Put yourself in ICANN's position and read it again. Not the words "support" and "applaud" in there. I make a living with written words, and I don't view those words and neutral.
There are plenty of ways to fight child porn without the entire adult industry being put in this awful position. I've been in this industry for a long time now... when it was just forming AS an industry. I think this industry is unlike any other, and for the most part I love its culture. It disturbs me to see people from INSIDE the industry put it at this kind of risk voluntarily.
|
Just my opinion. But you're right, the government may look at that as a form of endorsement, even though she isn't giving direct support to .xxx as an official ICANN domain. My only point is her "intentions" and that's what I'm trying to figure out here. It appears like she made very bad judgement, but everyone appears to be hanging her and ASACP on a tight noose for her death which might be a little pre-mature at this point. This is why I asked some other questions, it's important we know all the facts here. I don't think this letter alone proves enough evil intent on Joan's part.