GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - AVN Supports REQUIRING Adult Sites To Operate Under .XXX Domains:

mikesouth · 06-02-2005, 06:38 PM

from mikesouth.com

AVN Supports REQUIRING Adult Sites To Operate Under .XXX Domains:

Yep you read that right, for all the posturing and obfuscation they are doing on this issue they are selling us out every chance they get witness this:

"Tom Hymes, AVN Online

?There is also a strong case for having a content-specific gTLD (and corresponding SLDs under ccTLDs) such as .xxx or .sex. Sexually explicit services could then be legally required to operate with domain names in this gTLD (or SLD under a ccTLD) that would make it much simpler and easier to control access to such sites to protect children from the whitehouse.com problem, for example. This would not be to impose censorship or restrict free speech, but would restore an effective means for consumer choice which sites like whitehouse.com subvert by exploiting that present ?inherent propensity to confuse?). Similarly, non-commercial sites, including sites for abuse or complaint might usefully be allocated a specific SLD for that purpose.? [9]"

This was taken from a white paper submitted to the National Reseach Council By Jason Hendales, It was also presented to ICANN and others."

Don't believe me? Read it yourself RIGHT HERE

OK Tell me ONE MORE MOTHERFUCKING TIME how you were uninvolved on this issue!

06-02-2005, 06:38 PM
mikesouth Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: My High Horse Posts: 6,334	AVN Supports REQUIRING Adult Sites To Operate Under .XXX Domains: from mikesouth.com AVN Supports REQUIRING Adult Sites To Operate Under .XXX Domains: Yep you read that right, for all the posturing and obfuscation they are doing on this issue they are selling us out every chance they get witness this: "Tom Hymes, AVN Online ?There is also a strong case for having a content-specific gTLD (and corresponding SLDs under ccTLDs) such as .xxx or .sex. Sexually explicit services could then be legally required to operate with domain names in this gTLD (or SLD under a ccTLD) that would make it much simpler and easier to control access to such sites to protect children from the whitehouse.com problem, for example. This would not be to impose censorship or restrict free speech, but would restore an effective means for consumer choice which sites like whitehouse.com subvert by exploiting that present ?inherent propensity to confuse?). Similarly, non-commercial sites, including sites for abuse or complaint might usefully be allocated a specific SLD for that purpose.? [9]" This was taken from a white paper submitted to the National Reseach Council By Jason Hendales, It was also presented to ICANN and others." Don't believe me? Read it yourself RIGHT HERE OK Tell me ONE MORE MOTHERFUCKING TIME how you were uninvolved on this issue! __________________ Mike South It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.