Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Holly
.xxx is a stupid, stupid idea. That's what the bitching is about. It has nothing to do with fighting CP.
|
Totally agree Holly!!
And neither has USC 2257 (amended) have anything further to offer in respect of protecting children.
Also.. considering the track record of the US DOJ in several pedo cases, - the last thing on their minds is "protecting children". It does seen very odd that they have not instigated one action under USC 2257 since this became law in the 90's.
I'd also add that I have witnesses several cases first hand where individuals in an org have wasted over two years "negotiating" with the US DOJ when they had been presented with overwhelming evidence of multiple cases of child abuse and this was never disputed, - but never cared to act until they were threatened with embarassment elsewhere.
To now claim USC 2257 (amended) is protecting children is absurd - it always has protected children - that is, if they cared to enforce it.