Quote:
|
Originally Posted by baddog
ASACP's mission statement did not apply, so Joan took it upon herself to applaud the idea of .xxx - Now she will not retract that statement unless directed to by the advisory council.
|
Hmmmmmm lemme take a quick look at the IDEA of .xxx .
Quote:
Protecting children
This is not just a theoretical concern. Back in 2000, before Lawley got involved as president, ICM Registry applied to run the .xxx domain. But ICANN shot down the proposal.
It didn't take Congress long to get involved. At a hearing in February 2001, Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., demanded to know why ICANN didn't approve .xxx "as a means of protecting our kids from the awful, awful filth which is sometimes widespread on the Internet." Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., griped to a federal commission that .xxx was necessary to force adult Webmasters to "abide by the same standard as the proprietor of an X-rated movie theater." [/B]
|
-
Wow no danger here huh?
Was that the Idea?
I think it would be a good idea to take away any implied support.