Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
why is it not fair to say or even consider that one race is more successful than another? i have no problem with that.
are all races on the planet equally successful? or.. can we plot races on a "success curve"? with some more successful, some less, most average?
why not?
why are people so sensitive about it? if someone told me "Hey, Asians are much better at math than Americans" i would have no trouble with that. If someone said "black people have bigger dicks than asians" i would think "good for them". if i said "kenyans are better marathon runners than mexicans" - no one would care.
in fact, we have no trouble at all accepting these obvious differences when there are not significant negative connotations attached to them.
but when you say "blacks are less successful than japanese economically and socially (crime, welfare etc)" you are just a crazed, racist asshole?
|
I think this is because of 2 reasons:
1) When you're dealing with the mind versus something physical it is viewed very differently
2) In my opinion ...it is always blacks who are called to be not as smart, or not as much in control of their actions...ie ...violent.
Also, making comments like this is always dumb unless you look at the big picture.
ie....
Asians are smarter.
I mean, hell...i believe it. But i think this has to do with a strict up bringing and a white kid or a black kid for that matter in the exact same enviroment wouldnt be any more or less likely to be as smart
or how bout this one....
Black's are generally more advanced physically (more muscular)
If we go to africa we see that this is not the case. There are many tall, lanky black people. But this is a view of African-Americans. And many of these people were the decendants of slaves who were bread like farm animals to create the "super worker"