Quote:
|
The nonprofit, run by representatives of adult Web sites, free-speech, privacy and child-advocacy concerns, would determine registration eligibility.
|
This quote is taken from
HERE in the context of the article it implys that .xxx will have a Best Practices requirement. after reading the above mentioned quote.. It sure sounds like people may have to get the "good housekeeping seal" from ASACP in order to obtain their domains of choice. If someone had a long standing relationship with ASACP it seems like their requests might be approved a little quicker? If someone had a paid membership perhaps they get approval faster.
I am in no way implying that would happen. But indulge yourself and read the original article.
You guys are killing me here, Half of you don't think it's going to happen. when it has been pointed out to you VERY CLEARLY. Macks post documents the govt's feelings on the subject.
and if you took 5 fucking minutes to read you would see that ASACP stands to gain money NOT ONLY from the sale of .xxx domains. But as "The nonprofit, run by representatives of adult Web sites, free-speech, privacy and child-advocacy concerns, would determine registration eligibility." What part of this don't you understand.
Lensman wants Adult.xxx Lensman is a sponsor of ASACP Lensman will get Adult.xxx.
Baddog want Whitecheech.xxx. Baddog is not a sponsor of ASACP. Baddog's now needs to meet eligibility registration requirements that will be reviewed by "The nonprofit, run by representatives of adult Web sites, free-speech, privacy and child-advocacy concerns, would determine registration eligibility."
jesus, you guys are killing me here. The letter is not going to happen.