Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FightThisPatent
most websites aren't even compliant with the current 2257 on the books for the last 10 years.
here's a play at home game test for webmasters:
Pick out any image on your site.. an image on a tour, or a photo in one of your galleries (free or paysite), can you identify which content producer the image came from?
|
Are we neglecting the fact that in most cases these WMs would fall under the definition of sec. producer and therefore would have no legal obligation under the "current 2257" (I assume you mean the one prior to July this year) to have any records nor have a statement since this was thrown out by the 10th Circuit a few years back?
Not a lawyer here, but I was of the impression that this was one of the big sticking points that the FSC was going against as the "new" 2257 ignored this decision.