Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AaronM
So I suppose the product that has been created in part by a very well known Adult industry attorney is not compliant?
Your claim is horseshit.
Not only that but at this time with the 2257 stuff all up in the air, there is no way to possibly state that ANY product is 100% compliant.
|
Aaron,
Just yesterday I got a telephone call from Samuel Kaplan, the DOJ attorney who is heading up the case between the FSC and the DOJ. I was on the telephone with him for more than an hour, explaining to him exactly how our software works and how it addresses specifics of the 2257 regulations. I'm sure, based upon his remarks, that I will be contacted again in the future and I welcome his calls. I know things regarding the 2257 case that he stated to me, that currently, very few, if any other people, know. Things are moving. BTW, Today is the legal deadline for them to start doing inpections if they want since the hearing was held on Aug 2 and it's been 30 days since the hearing and Judge Miller hasn't made his ruling. I would advise anyone that is not in compliance to get there ASAP as there has already been an application of 2257 charges in another case due to plain view evidence rules. Unless Judge Miller specifically states inspections cannot take place, they will be starting to implement them soon.
You can hit me up on ICQ and I'll be glad to send you a copy of the PDF letter from the attorney that has reviewed 2257 MAVIS.