Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimmy
Nope...disagree. This is not an iFriends issue. This is an iFriends affiliate issue. Same as if a teenager broke a car window with a hammer he bought at Walmart. It's the teenager that is at fault. Walmart has nothing to do with it. So, for a competitor of Walmart to try and muddy up the name of Walmart by blaming them would be irresponsible and foolish. (ie. Lars vs ifriends)
Have a nice day.
|
Nice example , but not even close..
Ifriends is not culpible until they are notified..
Why make an example so far off base , lets make it more realistic..
If mcdonalds hired a company to make burger flyers to hand out infront of their restaurants and unbeknownst to them , the company that made the flyers simply copied the burger king flyer and crossed out "burger king" and inserted "mcdonalds"
While mcdonalds wouldnt be laible , if they were informed of the thievery and didn't take action ( i.e. stopped handing out the flyers , they would be )
And in such a case i wouldn't find it at all strange for burger king to write an editorial entitled " MCDONALDS BETTER GEt THIS TURNED OFF ASAP" even though mcdonalds didnt make the flyer ,furthermore they wouldn't be out of their legal right to say such a statement..
* I'm having a nice day thanks