Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 3piece chicken Dinner
with all due respect. if he is working at a large porn company These records would already be kept at the company, and would be on file. The purposed 2257 regs would have very little to do with that. This would be a case of poor hiring on the part of the company.
From the post it doesn't appear to be an affiliate.
In any case this is unprofessional and dangerous. And I really hope this party is found out and appropriate action is taken.
|
Poor hiring, sure - but with the secondary producer requirements stated as they are in the current 2257 regulations, what you essentially have is exponential growth in regard to how many people have access to this information. Where perhaps a few thousand people could have previously released this data, now you have closer to tens of thousands of people. That gives you a much higher chance of a "poor hire" committing these sort of acts. And it will only get worse if the Pence bill passes the senate with little or no changes since that adds a whole new layer of required record keepers to the equation as well as a whole new group of people who would be vulnerable to this kind of privacy violation... including practically every movie star in Hollywood.
This is the sort of thing that the ACLU needs to be on top of along side of the FSC. This is a direct violation of the right to privacy, and it will continue until the matter is addressed in the courts. Hopefully Hollywood will see the dangers in this and lobby to alter the Pence bill.