Quote:
Originally Posted by Dameian
Poor hiring, sure - but with the secondary producer requirements stated as they are in the current 2257 regulations, what you essentially have is exponential growth in regard to how many people have access to this information. Where perhaps a few thousand people could have previously released this data, now you have closer to tens of thousands of people. That gives you a much higher chance of a "poor hire" committing these sort of acts. And it will only get worse if the Pence bill passes the senate with little or no changes since that adds a whole new layer of required record keepers to the equation as well as a whole new group of people who would be vulnerable to this kind of privacy violation... including practically every movie star in Hollywood.
This is the sort of thing that the ACLU needs to be on top of along side of the FSC. This is a direct violation of the right to privacy, and it will continue until the matter is addressed in the courts. Hopefully Hollywood will see the dangers in this and lobby to alter the Pence bill.
|
I couldn't agree more with the more hands theory. My point was ( and probably doesn't really matter i guess) that the post indicated a rather large porn company, a opposed to a buddy with a website. An office full of women talking about titles ect ect........ But I will not take away from anything you have written because I agree with you.
PS. I thought the secondary producer requirements had been addressed and altered? maybe I was dreaming.