Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KRL
Sorry Mr F. but I'm looking at this case's facts and then judging those facts based on generally acceptable levels of community standards.
Publishing pedo fantasy stories about 6 month old babies getting finger fucked is OBSCENE, is over the line, and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. I have no sympathy for this site. It should not be protected as free spreech. The entire premise is to cater to the fantasies of pedos at the most debased and perverted levels imaginable. When you are writing sexually perverse stories describing pornographic acts on infants, toddlers, and children you are generating the same effeect as if you were publishing pictures of such.
As I stated above. There is no difference between words and images. Words create images in your mind. Images are described by words in your mind. The end result of both is that they create visual sexual stimulation in the mind.
|
So then how in your mind can movies that glorify murder not be obscene? I agree with you that stories like that are pretty freaking sick. I will also say if there are other things going on behind the scenes then it's a whole different matter.
However I don't think text alone no matter how bad it is should be censored and considered obscene. When you start banning words it's brings us ever so closer to the end of freedom of speech.
So let's say I wrote a book about becoming a suicide bomber should that mean I should be prosecuted as a terrorist, simply because it might stimulate the mind of someone that is already of that thinking?