Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CynthiaB
More good points - yes, sex with children is wrong. But I can write and profit greatly writing books and movies about the BTK killer and Charles Manson, and every other serial killer. I can get into their minds like Red Dragon and talk about how much I love the feel of it - the FBI isn't going to give a damn.
Also, I am amazed at how many people who run "teen" sites, cry foul when it comes to underage sex. If you think people come to your sites because they know those girls aren't really 14 - baloney. They come for the fantasy. How is that fantasy any different than words on a page?
Cyn
|
Only my
- folks can have as many fantasies as they want and visit as many "teen sites" and fantasize all day long. The difference is, assuming the "teen sites" are "legal", they are not showing images of underage kids being sexually abused nor do they have stuff about abusing babies.
Only me Cynthia, but there seems to be a very wide void between Hollywood or "real" literature hitting on the subject of "Lolita", - or writing about Manson and others, and content depicting some pervert sticking his dick in a childs face (or finger fucking babies).
It's not about fantasies, - more related to *publishing obscene material* which would more likely than not, be below any standards acceptable to a jury. Last I checked, there is no law against fantasies - least yet!
