Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CynthiaB
Absolutely, I'm not disagreeing with you here - but that's not what the original article stated - this discussion has strayed from what was presented as facts (be it true or not) that it was a wide variety of stories including "threesomes" that were involved in this situation.
If, indeed, it was nothing but a front for a kiddie porn site, yes - stories involving babies are sick. My question is where does it stop? IF it's true that a wide range of stories were at fault and not just that kind.
Cyn
|
Search the site on Google. Its as low as it goes in terms of CP. Stories about having sex with newborn infants??? Come on, anyone who justifies that under free speech is simply being absurd.