|
kamasutrababe, your attempting to take a love story (old / younger, with a side order of "and then they had sex") and compare it to "I fingered my 6 month old daughter".
Anyone with half a brain can see the difference. Have you ever read Lolita? Seen the movie? They guy isn't lusting after some 2 year old baby in diapers, now is he? If that was the case, do you truly think that the movie would have been made or the book published?
A just of 12 men and women could easily pick out the difference between a naughty tale of forbidden love and spank material for the sickest perverted pedos. This is a case as clear as the nose on your face (providing you have one). There is no grey area here.
Obscene material is obscene, no matter how it is presented.
Now, if the book lolita was 200 pages and 180 pages was graphic details about sexual acts, you might have a subject for discussion. Lolita is about 1% sex... and that is the "they made love until the sun came up" sort of thing.
Search the web for stories by red rose. You will able to see quite clearly that it is pretty much 98% about sex, sex abuse, and pedo activity. The difference between that and lolita is very, very clear.
If you can't see the difference, well... I truly feel sorry for you.
Alex
|