Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SureFire
dig420 and others,
I believe it already been said, Freedom of speech doesn?t give one the right to publish stories how to break into a bank, build a bomb, giving state secrets and so on.
If she was writing stories about imaging having sex with babies, I hope she rots in jail. How dare anyone write about taking advantage of a child for sexual pleasure? Children under five don?t have memories; they have feelings which form their personalities.
Freedom of speech does not give sick perverts the right to publish their words. And, I doubt that prosecuting her will take away any of my rights.
 |
so there should be a law against being a sick pervert? Well that's nice. Say goodbye to all your customers and half the great literature and art of the world.
There are no actual children being harmed when you write a story about it. It's PIXELS. What's being prosecuted here is not actual sex with a child, it's the IDEA of sex with a child. The THOUGHT of it. This is thought-crime, and there is no such thing as thought-crime in a free society. Prosecuting people for thought crimes of ANY kind puts you on a short and slippery slope toward absolute govt. tyranny.