Quote:
|
Originally Posted by KRL
I guess what made me less of a free speech advocate than I was in the past was becoming a parent. ...........I see your point and respect your point. And if this site was involving older teens it probably wouldn't seem so obscene, but when you start getting into stories about having sex with infants and toddlers, that to me is just really sick and depraved and indicative of the kinds of people that would have a high propensity to actually live out their fantasies with real kids.
|
Being a single parent in the adult business and having gone through a 9 month court case being persecuted for having adult sites, and being a parent, then being found clean as a whistle beyond any reasonable doubt by everyone involved I can honestly tell you the content on this site is fucked up.
I've read EVERY post in this thread (yeah I was bored and couldn't sleep)
Whenever it comes to issues like this I ask myself, would I fight to the death in the defense of this?
So I ask those of you supporting the red rose site... would you fight to the physical death, if necessary, to defend (what you think is) "their right" to create, and distribute this specific content involving the rape of babies, and defend the people who read it?
And don't broaden my question to include all free speech and movies and everything else under the sun.
The question is simple.
Would you fight to the physical death, if necessary, to defend (what you feel is) "their right" to create, and distribute this specific content involving the rape of babies, and defend the people who read it?