Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirtit
Do you read the links you expect others to read? Pretty selfish of you not to.
The last line of that looooong article specifically states:
"In this decision, at least, the [Supreme] Court has taken a strong and definite stand in favor of First Amendment rights, and has drawn a line in the sand when it comes to protected speech: If it does not involve children and is not obscene, it deserves First Amendment protection. "
|
yes, ACTUAL CHILDREN not fictional ones.
when no victims are being harmed its acceptable.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=comprehension