View Single Post
Old 10-10-2005, 08:05 AM  
Bladewire
StraightBro
 
Bladewire's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Monarch Beach, CA USA
Posts: 56,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
yes, ACTUAL CHILDREN not fictional ones.

when no victims are being harmed its acceptable.

http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=comprehension
Dude READ THE ARTICLE YOU LINKED TO!

"In this decision, at least, the [Supreme] Court has taken a strong and definite stand in favor of First Amendment rights, and has drawn a line in the sand when it comes to protected speech: If it does not involve children and is not obscene, it deserves First Amendment protection. "

If you think baby fucking pedo porn stories will not be judged obscene by anyone but pedos you are sadly mistaken.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch XXX
As i daid, not here to argue because i think its fear of losing your children that drive these arguments.

Pornographers with kids are the ones living in fear, not me.
You don't know me or how I live my life. I spent nine months fighting for MY RIGHT to freedom of expression, spent over $56,000 in attornies fees, only to have morons on GFY tell me I'm a "radical" because I think pushing baby fucking pedo porn stories is not ok.

I don't live in fear. I have nothing to hide.

The minority of you on this board saying the people who don't agree with you are AFRAID or AGAINST FREE SPEECH or are CONSERVATIVE are as bad as Bush. Everyone has to agree with you or they're a nonconformist, in an indisutry of nonconformist... oh that makes great sense. Very logical. I don't think you guys step out of your bubbles and take a good look at yourselves and the messages you put out in the world.
Bladewire is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote